Turn cryptographic findings into business decisions

Who this is for

Technology and risk owners who need to decide what to investigate, budget, sequence, or defer before selecting post-quantum implementations.

The question this answers

Which migration decisions should we prioritize, investigate, or defer?

What we need to begin

• A cryptographic inventory or enough evidence to establish a bounded baseline
• Business owners for critical systems and sensitive data
• Known retention, confidentiality, availability, and interoperability requirements
• Relevant vendor roadmaps, contracts, and platform constraints where available

What we assess

• Data confidentiality lifetime and harvest-now, decrypt-later exposure
• Business criticality, change windows, dependencies, and recovery constraints
• Vendor and platform readiness, including uncertain or unsupported migration paths
• Crypto-agility capabilities across software, protocols, infrastructure, and operations
• Priority based on evidence, impact, urgency, feasibility, and unresolved unknowns

What you receive

• An evidence-labelled readiness summary and decision register
• A prioritized risk and dependency map
• A phased crypto-agility and migration roadmap
• Vendor questions, proof-of-concept candidates, and explicit decision gates

Important limitations

• The assessment does not certify regulatory compliance or declare an organization quantum-safe.
• Priorities may change as standards, protocols, products, vendor support, and business systems evolve.
• Recommendations are limited by the accuracy and completeness of the supplied inventory and stakeholder evidence.